Banned = Banned

[517Houston]

The "poll' questions are kind of lame

 

[Titoezz]

Felon is talking about TakeAway Damage

 

[DamageINC]

Hmm, yeah.. After going over this thread again I'm quite how i made that mistake. I deleted my post. Thanks for pointing that out Tito. I have no clue whatsoever why the hell i thought he was talking to The Dude. I guess it was because his was the last post i read or something.

 

[Nitroz]

rip isnt even a real clan anymore are they?

I don't know lol, I left them because well see see what happened wasss....I was playing with -=RiP=-TAPOUT and -=RiP=-Zack and We cought him aimbotting so I recored it for like a minute then he got banned then I posted it on xfire then I told nect0 (leader of RiP) and then a couple days later I asked if he was kicked out then he was like "I give people 2nd chances" and Im just gonna say I dont want hackers in a clan with me so I left.

 

[MassNightmare]

I don't know lol, I left them because well see see what happened wasss....I was playing with -=RiP=-TAPOUT and -=RiP=-Zack and We cought him aimbotting so I recored it for like a minute then he got banned then I posted it on xfire then I told nect0 (leader of RiP) and then a couple days later I asked if he was kicked out then he was like "I give people 2nd chances" and Im just gonna say I dont want hackers in a clan with me so I left.

Wow I didnt know that.I also recorded some video of zach and another person probably his friend.Now I'll agree RiP has its faults but so far they're an ok clan.And @MasterClip idk how many applied I've only been in the clan for about a month now.

 

[MikeK]

Can't undertand all of us said "yes give them the second chance" (me too) and there were only Take and Goldenfire who said "NO" but there are 9 votes "no" WTF? they have voted for four times each???

 

[felon]

Mike, I think that is because the poll is not the same question as what was actually asked, not all hackers get 2nd chances, this is a very very specific case.

 

[TheDude]

People tend to make polls with questions so pointed at such a specific topic that the issue is worthless to vote on in the first place. Obviously we are not going to give everyone a second chance. If you ask a stupid question....

 

[MikeK]

Im not asking to giva a seconbd chance to every1

 

[TheDude]

I didn't say you were. I was remarking on the poll options.

 

[Cent0]

xfire then I told nect0 (leader of RiP).

sorry WHAT? that beech has the same letters in his name as me ! I must find him and destroy him.

 

[TheDude]

I think the soulg thread is a perfect example of why we need to promote better communication between mods, more careful record keeping and banning, and also of the fact that we need to be able to give some people second chances, even if they are arrogant douches.

 

[BluBirD78]

I think the soulg thread is a perfect example of why we need to promote better communication between mods, more careful record keeping and banning, and also of the fact that we need to be able to give some people second chances, even if they are arrogant douches.

For reals, the arrogant douches need a second chance, the others that we "might" think they may hack, ban them immediately!

 

[Ethan]

I also voted no on this because we have an "Appeal Bans Thread". Keeping all people banned forever will take away the point for that thread, and would make us seem like very mean people!

 

[AVC]

I also voted no on this because we have an "Appeal Bans Thread". Keeping all people banned forever will take away the point for that thread, and would make us seem like very mean people!

Good point.
Even criminals get out oj jail eventually (well not all).
I'm happy to give people second chances, if they front up and say "sorry, won't happen again.
Third chances? Not.

 

[Cent0]

Ahn I hope you mean by no that you clicked on the yes button....