Why do articles use [sic]?

WaLLy

Lieutenant General
|K3| Executive
So I kinda get the meaning. And if I'm understanding it correctly, it gets used in quotes.

My question is, why use [sic] if you're already pasting the quote in your article?
 

WaLLy

Lieutenant General
|K3| Executive
Yeah, but if it's being used as a quote, why is it necessary to use it? To me if it's written in a quote then I know that's how it was said.
 

DamageINC

K3's Useless Admin
|K3| Executive
So many things on the net are poorly edited and rushed to publish as fast as possible. There is also a lot of :bullshit: out there. I think it lets the reader know that the author has it correct and didn't fk the quote up or mistype it, etc. when said quote contains errors.
 

MikeK

Vodka supplier
|K3| Member
Pretty much as Daniel put it.

Most often, it's used when one quotes a statement that contains a typo to highlight that this is not a mistake in quoting (otherwise the reader would have been left guessing who made the typo or used a weird word - author of the original text or author of the quote).

It may be important in formal texts (e.g. I very often see this in sophisticated legal documents) or when someone specifically cares of the linguistics and style of the text and wants to transmit the 'flavour' of the original text to the reader of the quote.

M
[DOUBLEPOST=1482361030][/DOUBLEPOST]I mean, you never know if someone copy-pasted the quoted text or typed it manually, which is when errors could have been made while typing the quote (and it does happen).
 
Top Bottom